<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 181 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3925</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that amounts received by the Respondents under an agreement with ICICI Home Loan Finance Ltd. are taxable under Business Auxiliary Services. The Tribunal clarified that since ICICI did not receive any amount from the Respondents, the franchisor&#039;s liability did not arise. The Tribunal upheld the tax demand from the Respondents under Business Auxiliary Services. Additionally, penalties imposed on the Respondents were waived due to their accurate information provision and lack of intention to evade tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 181 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3925</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that amounts received by the Respondents under an agreement with ICICI Home Loan Finance Ltd. are taxable under Business Auxiliary Services. The Tribunal clarified that since ICICI did not receive any amount from the Respondents, the franchisor&#039;s liability did not arise. The Tribunal upheld the tax demand from the Respondents under Business Auxiliary Services. Additionally, penalties imposed on the Respondents were waived due to their accurate information provision and lack of intention to evade tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>