https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183903 Section 100 CPC confines a second appeal to substantial questions of law, and the High Court cannot reappreciate evidence or disturb concurrent findings of fact unless such questions are framed and decided. The document also notes that a transaction supported by evidence as nominal, or executed as security for money advanced, may be treated as ineffective despite later assertions of a genuine sale or exchange. Where possession, consideration, and surrounding circumstances consistently supported the lower courts' view, the decree declaring the sale deed ineffective and granting injunction was restored. en-us Fri, 05 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:22:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183903 Section 100 CPC confines a second appeal to substantial questions of law, and the High Court cannot reappreciate evidence or disturb concurrent findings of fact unless such questions are framed and decided. The document also notes that a transaction supported by evidence as nominal, or executed as security for money advanced, may be treated as ineffective despite later assertions of a genuine sale or exchange. Where possession, consideration, and surrounding circumstances consistently supported the lower courts' view, the decree declaring the sale deed ineffective and granting injunction was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183903