<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 446 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183900</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellants&#039; request for dispensation of the pre-deposit of duty amount and penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune. The dispute centered on the appellants&#039; entitlement to credit service tax paid on advertisement expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the broad interpretation of &quot;input service&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, which includes services indirectly related to the manufacture of the final product. The Tribunal acknowledged the importance of advertisement in promoting the sale of aerated water, leading to a favorable decision for the appellants, with the appeal set for final disposal on 13-11-2006.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2020 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 446 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183900</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellants&#039; request for dispensation of the pre-deposit of duty amount and penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune. The dispute centered on the appellants&#039; entitlement to credit service tax paid on advertisement expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the broad interpretation of &quot;input service&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, which includes services indirectly related to the manufacture of the final product. The Tribunal acknowledged the importance of advertisement in promoting the sale of aerated water, leading to a favorable decision for the appellants, with the appeal set for final disposal on 13-11-2006.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>