<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 686 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183894</link>
    <description>Under section 28-B of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, liability based on non-surrender of a transit pass can arise only after the revenue first proves that the transit form relates to the assessee. Internal check-post entries such as Panji-3, standing alone and unsigned by the driver or person-in-charge, are insufficient to fasten tax liability without confronting the assessee with the relevant transit forms, G.Rs., or other corroborative material. The discussion also notes that the Tribunal&#039;s view on &quot;parchun&quot; goods was commercially unsound, but that error did not affect the result because the foundational linkage between the forms, the consignments, and the assessee was not proved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:58:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 686 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183894</link>
      <description>Under section 28-B of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, liability based on non-surrender of a transit pass can arise only after the revenue first proves that the transit form relates to the assessee. Internal check-post entries such as Panji-3, standing alone and unsigned by the driver or person-in-charge, are insufficient to fasten tax liability without confronting the assessee with the relevant transit forms, G.Rs., or other corroborative material. The discussion also notes that the Tribunal&#039;s view on &quot;parchun&quot; goods was commercially unsound, but that error did not affect the result because the foundational linkage between the forms, the consignments, and the assessee was not proved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>