<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 669 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183864</link>
    <description>The case involved determining whether rents from a godown constitute business income or income from house property. The President of ITAT Mumbai concluded that the godowns were commercial assets intended for business use, classifying the rent receipts as business income. As a result, the lower authorities&#039; decisions were set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:48:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 669 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183864</link>
      <description>The case involved determining whether rents from a godown constitute business income or income from house property. The President of ITAT Mumbai concluded that the godowns were commercial assets intended for business use, classifying the rent receipts as business income. As a result, the lower authorities&#039; decisions were set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>