<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 1087 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183862</link>
    <description>The court referred the case to a larger Bench to reconsider the interpretation of the exemption under section 80-O, emphasizing the impact of statutory amendments and previous court decisions on tax law interpretation. The court did not address the disallowance of consultation fees and commission paid to the managing director, as the primary issue required further examination. The decision underscores the significance of comprehensive analysis in interpreting tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:37:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 1087 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183862</link>
      <description>The court referred the case to a larger Bench to reconsider the interpretation of the exemption under section 80-O, emphasizing the impact of statutory amendments and previous court decisions on tax law interpretation. The court did not address the disallowance of consultation fees and commission paid to the managing director, as the primary issue required further examination. The decision underscores the significance of comprehensive analysis in interpreting tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>