<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Section 87 of Finance Act Misapplied in Service Tax Recovery Case Involving Food Corporation of India.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29913</link>
    <description>Recovery of service tax from the FCI where service provider failed to deposit the amount with the service tax department - was there any due of Kailash Enterprise from FCI? - The answer is obviously in the negative. Section 87 of the Finance Act, 1997 was therefore wrongly invoked - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:28:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:45:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Section 87 of Finance Act Misapplied in Service Tax Recovery Case Involving Food Corporation of India.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29913</link>
      <description>Recovery of service tax from the FCI where service provider failed to deposit the amount with the service tax department - was there any due of Kailash Enterprise from FCI? - The answer is obviously in the negative. Section 87 of the Finance Act, 1997 was therefore wrongly invoked - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:28:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>