<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 858 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329149</link>
    <description>Non-carrying and non-production of declaration Form ST-18A for taxable goods in transit justified penalty under Section 78(5) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994. The mandatory nature of the declaration form under Section 78(2) read with Rule 53 meant that failure to produce it at interception or after notice constituted a serious contravention. The Court further noted that, even before the 22.03.2002 amendment, the provision was wide enough to cover the owner and that the penalty was a civil liability not dependent on mens rea. The explanations offered were found untenable, and the penalty was held rightly leviable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:14:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 858 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329149</link>
      <description>Non-carrying and non-production of declaration Form ST-18A for taxable goods in transit justified penalty under Section 78(5) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994. The mandatory nature of the declaration form under Section 78(2) read with Rule 53 meant that failure to produce it at interception or after notice constituted a serious contravention. The Court further noted that, even before the 22.03.2002 amendment, the provision was wide enough to cover the owner and that the penalty was a civil liability not dependent on mens rea. The explanations offered were found untenable, and the penalty was held rightly leviable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>