<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 844 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329135</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions on account of fringe benefits from sales promotion/lodging expenses, telephone expenses, and gift expenses. The Tribunal emphasized that fringe benefits tax applies only to benefits provided to employees, and the expenses in question were part of the business model, benefiting customers and agents, not employees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:06:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 844 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329135</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions on account of fringe benefits from sales promotion/lodging expenses, telephone expenses, and gift expenses. The Tribunal emphasized that fringe benefits tax applies only to benefits provided to employees, and the expenses in question were part of the business model, benefiting customers and agents, not employees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>