<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 842 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329133</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 271C. The ITAT ruled that hire purchase transactions and finance charges did not constitute interest for TDS purposes, in line with previous judicial decisions. The decision was based on a detailed analysis and reliance on legal precedents, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:06:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 842 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329133</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 271C. The ITAT ruled that hire purchase transactions and finance charges did not constitute interest for TDS purposes, in line with previous judicial decisions. The decision was based on a detailed analysis and reliance on legal precedents, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>