<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 73 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3911</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for further adjudication to address the denial of input service tax credit and the interpretation of Rule 6(3)(c) in light of the tax payments made post the initial decision. The impugned order was set aside to allow the appellant to present evidence of tax payment on &#039;US FEED&#039; and input services for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 73 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3911</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for further adjudication to address the denial of input service tax credit and the interpretation of Rule 6(3)(c) in light of the tax payments made post the initial decision. The impugned order was set aside to allow the appellant to present evidence of tax payment on &#039;US FEED&#039; and input services for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>