https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183843 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging a 1966 order was filed in 1970 after the petitioner had already pursued other remedies, with no satisfactory explanation for the delay. The court treated the unexplained lapse of time as fatal to invocation of extraordinary writ jurisdiction and upheld refusal of relief at the threshold. The petition was therefore barred by gross delay and liable to dismissal. en-us Mon, 28 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:00:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183843 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging a 1966 order was filed in 1970 after the petitioner had already pursued other remedies, with no satisfactory explanation for the delay. The court treated the unexplained lapse of time as fatal to invocation of extraordinary writ jurisdiction and upheld refusal of relief at the threshold. The petition was therefore barred by gross delay and liable to dismissal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183843