https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183842 A High Court should ordinarily decline writ jurisdiction under Article 226 in an election dispute where the governing rules provide a special and efficacious statutory remedy through an election petition and tribunal. Because the election rules created a dedicated forum, imposed a short limitation period, and an election petition on the same subject was already pending, entertaining the writ petition would have bypassed the prescribed mechanism and undermined the statutory scheme. The dispute was required to be pursued before the election tribunal rather than through parallel writ proceedings. en-us Tue, 15 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:55:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183842 A High Court should ordinarily decline writ jurisdiction under Article 226 in an election dispute where the governing rules provide a special and efficacious statutory remedy through an election petition and tribunal. Because the election rules created a dedicated forum, imposed a short limitation period, and an election petition on the same subject was already pending, entertaining the writ petition would have bypassed the prescribed mechanism and undermined the statutory scheme. The dispute was required to be pursued before the election tribunal rather than through parallel writ proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183842