https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183840 Writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be used to challenge retrenchment where an effective statutory remedy under the Industrial Disputes Act exists, especially when workmen delay approaching the High Court and bypass the industrial forum. The text also states that, for Chapter V-B, a forest corporation may qualify as an industrial establishment if its operations amount to a factory under the Factories Act; cutting trees, shaping timber and preparing material for sale were treated as manufacturing process. On that basis, Section 25-N applied, and retrenchment without its mandatory compliance was illegal and non est. en-us Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jun 2025 11:15:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183840 Writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be used to challenge retrenchment where an effective statutory remedy under the Industrial Disputes Act exists, especially when workmen delay approaching the High Court and bypass the industrial forum. The text also states that, for Chapter V-B, a forest corporation may qualify as an industrial establishment if its operations amount to a factory under the Factories Act; cutting trees, shaping timber and preparing material for sale were treated as manufacturing process. On that basis, Section 25-N applied, and retrenchment without its mandatory compliance was illegal and non est. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183840