<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (11) TMI 232 - CEGAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183839</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on the appellants, rejecting their contentions regarding the reliance on retracted statements, burden of proof, plea of alibi, and the findings of criminal courts. The Tribunal found that the evidence provided by the Customs authorities was sufficient and corroborated, and the appellants failed to discharge their burden of proving the plea of alibi. The appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:33:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (11) TMI 232 - CEGAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183839</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on the appellants, rejecting their contentions regarding the reliance on retracted statements, burden of proof, plea of alibi, and the findings of criminal courts. The Tribunal found that the evidence provided by the Customs authorities was sufficient and corroborated, and the appellants failed to discharge their burden of proving the plea of alibi. The appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>