<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 930 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183835</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decisions of the Tribunal and Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals, ruling that the notice issued under Section 148 was indeed barred by limitation. It was concluded that Section 150 of the Income Tax Act did not save the limitation for assessing the present assessee. Therefore, the appeal by the revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:20:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 930 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183835</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decisions of the Tribunal and Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals, ruling that the notice issued under Section 148 was indeed barred by limitation. It was concluded that Section 150 of the Income Tax Act did not save the limitation for assessing the present assessee. Therefore, the appeal by the revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>