<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 876 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183821</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed because the question raised was already covered against the appellant by the prior decision in Union of India v. Delhi Cloth &amp; General Mills Co. Ltd. The Court applied that binding precedent and found no need for further reasoning, disposing of the matters by reference to the earlier authoritative judgment. The operative point is that once the issue stood concluded by existing Supreme Court authority, the appeals could not succeed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:53:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 876 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183821</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed because the question raised was already covered against the appellant by the prior decision in Union of India v. Delhi Cloth &amp; General Mills Co. Ltd. The Court applied that binding precedent and found no need for further reasoning, disposing of the matters by reference to the earlier authoritative judgment. The operative point is that once the issue stood concluded by existing Supreme Court authority, the appeals could not succeed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>