https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183815 In preventive detention, each communicated ground must contain sufficient particulars to enable an effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The Supreme Court held that the ground alleging unauthorised milling of paddy and smuggling of rice was not merely imprecise but an independent substantive ground lacking particulars of time, place, or instance, so it could not be treated as a mere inference from seizure details. Because detention rested on multiple grounds and one valid basis was absent, the detention orders were vitiated. The pending reference before the Advisory Board did not prevent examination of the already breached constitutional safeguard, and the detenus were entitled to release. en-us Thu, 11 Oct 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Dec 2017 17:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183815 In preventive detention, each communicated ground must contain sufficient particulars to enable an effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The Supreme Court held that the ground alleging unauthorised milling of paddy and smuggling of rice was not merely imprecise but an independent substantive ground lacking particulars of time, place, or instance, so it could not be treated as a mere inference from seizure details. Because detention rested on multiple grounds and one valid basis was absent, the detention orders were vitiated. The pending reference before the Advisory Board did not prevent examination of the already breached constitutional safeguard, and the detenus were entitled to release. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Oct 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183815