https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183813 A question already conclusively decided in an earlier order could not be reopened in execution. The decree in terms of the award had been interpreted by the prior order as refusing future interest, and that order was neither challenged nor set aside. Although a decree on an award may, as a general rule, carry future interest where not otherwise modified, the parties had accepted the earlier construction and proceeded on the basis that such interest was not granted. The respondents were therefore barred from claiming future interest in execution, and the High Court erred in disregarding the final order. en-us Wed, 06 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:39:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183813 A question already conclusively decided in an earlier order could not be reopened in execution. The decree in terms of the award had been interpreted by the prior order as refusing future interest, and that order was neither challenged nor set aside. Although a decree on an award may, as a general rule, carry future interest where not otherwise modified, the parties had accepted the earlier construction and proceeded on the basis that such interest was not granted. The respondents were therefore barred from claiming future interest in execution, and the High Court erred in disregarding the final order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183813