<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 178 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3906</link>
    <description>The case involved determining related persons for valuation under the Central Excise Act, 1944. It addressed duty liability based on assessable value and the treatment of waste in such calculations. The court found M/s. KG. Naidu Mills and M/s. K.G. Denim Ltd. to be related due to manufacturing arrangements. The demand for duty was challenged for lacking a proper proposal in the show cause notice, leading to the demand being invalidated. The decision emphasized procedural requirements and the importance of adherence to legal standards in excise duty matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 178 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3906</link>
      <description>The case involved determining related persons for valuation under the Central Excise Act, 1944. It addressed duty liability based on assessable value and the treatment of waste in such calculations. The court found M/s. KG. Naidu Mills and M/s. K.G. Denim Ltd. to be related due to manufacturing arrangements. The demand for duty was challenged for lacking a proper proposal in the show cause notice, leading to the demand being invalidated. The decision emphasized procedural requirements and the importance of adherence to legal standards in excise duty matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>