<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 844 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183811</link>
    <description>Inputs used as fuel for generating steam within the factory fell outside Rule 57CC, because that provision excluded fuel inputs from the requirement to maintain separate accounts and from the consequential 8% payment on exempted goods. On the undisputed facts, RFO was used only as fuel for steam generation, so the Revenue&#039;s demand under Rule 57CC could not stand. Separately, duty-paid RFO used in boilers for generating steam was eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57B(1)(iv), which specifically permitted credit on goods used for generation of steam within the factory, regardless of whether the steam supported dutiable or exempted production. The assessee succeeded on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 844 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183811</link>
      <description>Inputs used as fuel for generating steam within the factory fell outside Rule 57CC, because that provision excluded fuel inputs from the requirement to maintain separate accounts and from the consequential 8% payment on exempted goods. On the undisputed facts, RFO was used only as fuel for steam generation, so the Revenue&#039;s demand under Rule 57CC could not stand. Separately, duty-paid RFO used in boilers for generating steam was eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57B(1)(iv), which specifically permitted credit on goods used for generation of steam within the factory, regardless of whether the steam supported dutiable or exempted production. The assessee succeeded on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>