https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183807 Revenue entries may support a rebuttable presumption of possession, but they do not by themselves prove title. In a suit for permanent and mandatory injunction affecting disputed land, the plaintiff must first establish that the property forms part of the claimed estate; the burden does not shift to the defendant to disprove the claim or to challenge the commissioner's report. Where the courts grant injunctive relief while leaving title unresolved and apply the wrong burden of proof, the decree cannot stand. The matter is therefore remitted for fresh consideration on proper proof, with liberty to seek amendment and adduce additional evidence, including measurement through a commissioner. en-us Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Dec 2023 15:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183807 Revenue entries may support a rebuttable presumption of possession, but they do not by themselves prove title. In a suit for permanent and mandatory injunction affecting disputed land, the plaintiff must first establish that the property forms part of the claimed estate; the burden does not shift to the defendant to disprove the claim or to challenge the commissioner's report. Where the courts grant injunctive relief while leaving title unresolved and apply the wrong burden of proof, the decree cannot stand. The matter is therefore remitted for fresh consideration on proper proof, with liberty to seek amendment and adduce additional evidence, including measurement through a commissioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183807