<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 552 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183804</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal against the deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2001-02. It held that a legal heir cannot be held accountable for the actions of a deceased assessee in penalty proceedings. The Tribunal clarified that while legal representatives are liable for sums the deceased would have been responsible for if alive, penalty proceedings are distinct from assessment proceedings. Therefore, the department&#039;s argument, based on misinterpreting the law, was rejected, and the penalty deletion was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:12:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 552 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183804</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal against the deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2001-02. It held that a legal heir cannot be held accountable for the actions of a deceased assessee in penalty proceedings. The Tribunal clarified that while legal representatives are liable for sums the deceased would have been responsible for if alive, penalty proceedings are distinct from assessment proceedings. Therefore, the department&#039;s argument, based on misinterpreting the law, was rejected, and the penalty deletion was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>