https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183797 The dispute concerned whether contract carriage activity could be classified as tour operator service for service tax purposes, and whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal. The Tribunal noted that the classification issue was already covered by cited tribunal and High Court decisions relied on by the appellant. On that basis, it granted interim protection, waived the pre-deposit, and stayed coercive recovery until disposal of the appeal. en-us Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:30:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183797 The dispute concerned whether contract carriage activity could be classified as tour operator service for service tax purposes, and whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal. The Tribunal noted that the classification issue was already covered by cited tribunal and High Court decisions relied on by the appellant. On that basis, it granted interim protection, waived the pre-deposit, and stayed coercive recovery until disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183797