<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Extended Duty Demand Post-ER-1 Return Scrutiny Deemed Unreasonable After Two-Year Delay.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29887</link>
    <description>Demand of duty - the starting of the enquiry was stated to be scrutiny of ER-1 Returns. This was done apparently after two years. Invoking extended period for demand is not tenable in such a situation. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:48:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:48:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Extended Duty Demand Post-ER-1 Return Scrutiny Deemed Unreasonable After Two-Year Delay.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29887</link>
      <description>Demand of duty - the starting of the enquiry was stated to be scrutiny of ER-1 Returns. This was done apparently after two years. Invoking extended period for demand is not tenable in such a situation. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:48:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>