https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329119 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Commissioner's order that denied cenvat credit on inputs sent to a job worker without reversing the credit. The Tribunal found the appellants' actions in compliance with Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules and established legal precedents, concluding that the denial of credit on processed goods paid for by the job worker was unwarranted. The decision emphasized the permissibility of availing cenvat credit on inputs sent to job workers without reversal and upheld the appellants' position based on the relevant rules and precedents. en-us Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2016 13:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329119 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Commissioner's order that denied cenvat credit on inputs sent to a job worker without reversing the credit. The Tribunal found the appellants' actions in compliance with Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules and established legal precedents, concluding that the denial of credit on processed goods paid for by the job worker was unwarranted. The decision emphasized the permissibility of availing cenvat credit on inputs sent to job workers without reversal and upheld the appellants' position based on the relevant rules and precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329119