<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 826 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order, based on the show cause notice being time-barred. The appellant&#039;s disclosure and evidence were considered, with the Tribunal emphasizing that suppression requires deliberate withholding of information. The decision highlighted the significance of disclosure, suppression, and retrospective application of amendments in determining the admissibility of CENVAT credit on MS items for capital goods fabrication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 826 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order, based on the show cause notice being time-barred. The appellant&#039;s disclosure and evidence were considered, with the Tribunal emphasizing that suppression requires deliberate withholding of information. The decision highlighted the significance of disclosure, suppression, and retrospective application of amendments in determining the admissibility of CENVAT credit on MS items for capital goods fabrication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>