https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329113 The court upheld the Settlement Commission's order rejecting the application due to lack of cooperation by the petitioner. The court found that the Commission followed proper procedures, gave multiple opportunities to cooperate, and based its decision on facts. Additionally, the court noted the impact of a pending CBI investigation on the application but found the Commission's decision to send back the matter for adjudication justified. Despite the petitioner's claims of not being given a fair opportunity to present their case, the court concluded that the petitioner's actions demonstrated non-cooperation, leading to the dismissal of the writ petitions. en-us Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329113 The court upheld the Settlement Commission's order rejecting the application due to lack of cooperation by the petitioner. The court found that the Commission followed proper procedures, gave multiple opportunities to cooperate, and based its decision on facts. Additionally, the court noted the impact of a pending CBI investigation on the application but found the Commission's decision to send back the matter for adjudication justified. Despite the petitioner's claims of not being given a fair opportunity to present their case, the court concluded that the petitioner's actions demonstrated non-cooperation, leading to the dismissal of the writ petitions. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329113