<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 818 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329109</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting consequential reliefs to the appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of interpreting contractual terms accurately to determine the place of removal and eligibility for tax credits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 818 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329109</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting consequential reliefs to the appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of interpreting contractual terms accurately to determine the place of removal and eligibility for tax credits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>