https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329107 The court upheld the order-in-original passed by the Commissioner Customs (Imports), Mumbai, in favor of M/s. Tadano Limited and their Logistics Contractor. The order refrained from denying exemption, confiscating goods, or imposing penalties, while also directing the refund of Customs duty already paid by the importer. The court expressed disapproval of delays by authorities and set a strict deadline for the Commissioner to pass consequential orders, emphasizing the need for timely actions to prevent repeated court interventions. The survivability of a notice and proceedings under Customs Broker Licensing Regulations were also addressed, with the court setting a deadline for their completion. en-us Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Nov 2016 17:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329107 The court upheld the order-in-original passed by the Commissioner Customs (Imports), Mumbai, in favor of M/s. Tadano Limited and their Logistics Contractor. The order refrained from denying exemption, confiscating goods, or imposing penalties, while also directing the refund of Customs duty already paid by the importer. The court expressed disapproval of delays by authorities and set a strict deadline for the Commissioner to pass consequential orders, emphasizing the need for timely actions to prevent repeated court interventions. The survivability of a notice and proceedings under Customs Broker Licensing Regulations were also addressed, with the court setting a deadline for their completion. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329107