<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 808 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329099</link>
    <description>An appellate order in VAT matters is unsustainable where it addresses only burden of proof for input tax credit but omits reasons on material contentions, additional documents, and the plea for consideration of further evidence. The High Court noted that the Tribunal did not examine the timing of the revisional order, the later production of railway documents, or whether it could act as a final fact-finding authority under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. As those matters could affect entitlement to input tax credit, the order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after hearing both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 808 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329099</link>
      <description>An appellate order in VAT matters is unsustainable where it addresses only burden of proof for input tax credit but omits reasons on material contentions, additional documents, and the plea for consideration of further evidence. The High Court noted that the Tribunal did not examine the timing of the revisional order, the later production of railway documents, or whether it could act as a final fact-finding authority under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. As those matters could affect entitlement to input tax credit, the order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after hearing both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>