<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 174 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3897</link>
    <description>Liability to reverse Cenvat credit under Rule 6(3)(a) arises only on clearance of exempted final products from the factory. Where the disputed goods were lost during storage and no exempted quantity was removed or cleared from the factory, the statutory condition for recovery was not met. On that basis, the demand for reversal was held inapplicable and the order setting aside recovery was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 174 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3897</link>
      <description>Liability to reverse Cenvat credit under Rule 6(3)(a) arises only on clearance of exempted final products from the factory. Where the disputed goods were lost during storage and no exempted quantity was removed or cleared from the factory, the statutory condition for recovery was not met. On that basis, the demand for reversal was held inapplicable and the order setting aside recovery was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>