<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 797 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329088</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, upholding the cancellation of penalty under section 271(1)(c). The decision was based on the debatable nature of the issue and the substantial questions of law admitted by the Jurisdictional High Court, concluding that the penalty was not imposable in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 08:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 797 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329088</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, upholding the cancellation of penalty under section 271(1)(c). The decision was based on the debatable nature of the issue and the substantial questions of law admitted by the Jurisdictional High Court, concluding that the penalty was not imposable in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>