<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 789 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329080</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that software expenses incurred by the assessee were revenue in nature and not capital expenditure. Therefore, the disallowance of Rs. 14,12,131 was deleted. Consequently, the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) was also deleted as it was based on the disallowed amount. Both appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:07:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 789 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329080</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that software expenses incurred by the assessee were revenue in nature and not capital expenditure. Therefore, the disallowance of Rs. 14,12,131 was deleted. Consequently, the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) was also deleted as it was based on the disallowed amount. Both appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>