https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183791 A writ petition under Article 226 is not the proper forum where determination of land rights depends on disputed facts, the precise scope of sanctions, and the terms of annexed agreements. If the foundational facts are not established on the record and the controversy cannot be resolved without evidence, the writ court should avoid deciding the merits. The appropriate remedy in such circumstances is a regular civil suit, where the parties can lead evidence and have the title dispute adjudicated on a proper factual basis. en-us Thu, 04 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:37:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183791 A writ petition under Article 226 is not the proper forum where determination of land rights depends on disputed facts, the precise scope of sanctions, and the terms of annexed agreements. If the foundational facts are not established on the record and the controversy cannot be resolved without evidence, the writ court should avoid deciding the merits. The appropriate remedy in such circumstances is a regular civil suit, where the parties can lead evidence and have the title dispute adjudicated on a proper factual basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183791