<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Accounting Constraints Insufficient to Prove Service Tax Passed On; Refund Sought by Appellant Approved.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29865</link>
    <description>Claim of refund of service tax amount which was not required to be paid by appellant as per law - Unjust enrichment - claim of expenditure in the profit and loss account - The constraints faced in accounting cannot be a ground to assume that the duty has been passed on to another - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:14:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:14:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Accounting Constraints Insufficient to Prove Service Tax Passed On; Refund Sought by Appellant Approved.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29865</link>
      <description>Claim of refund of service tax amount which was not required to be paid by appellant as per law - Unjust enrichment - claim of expenditure in the profit and loss account - The constraints faced in accounting cannot be a ground to assume that the duty has been passed on to another - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:14:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>