<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 779 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329070</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was eligible for a refund of the interest paid on the service tax amount not required to be paid. The order directing the refund to be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund was set aside, and the appellant was deemed entitled to receive the sanctioned amount as a refund. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant with consequential reliefs, if any.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 779 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329070</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was eligible for a refund of the interest paid on the service tax amount not required to be paid. The order directing the refund to be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund was set aside, and the appellant was deemed entitled to receive the sanctioned amount as a refund. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant with consequential reliefs, if any.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>