<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 69 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3890</link>
    <description>Captively used fuel generating electricity was treated as eligible for Notification No. 67/95-C.E. relief to the extent the duty element was creditable, so the demand was not sustainable for electricity used in relation to dutiable or exempted manufacture on a revenue-neutral basis. Duty liability survived only for the portion of fuel attributable to electricity consumed in non-manufacturing activities such as residential premises, a guest house and a canteen, and the matter was remanded for quantification of that limited amount. Penalties were set aside because the dispute was bona fide and no mala fide intent was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 69 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3890</link>
      <description>Captively used fuel generating electricity was treated as eligible for Notification No. 67/95-C.E. relief to the extent the duty element was creditable, so the demand was not sustainable for electricity used in relation to dutiable or exempted manufacture on a revenue-neutral basis. Duty liability survived only for the portion of fuel attributable to electricity consumed in non-manufacturing activities such as residential premises, a guest house and a canteen, and the matter was remanded for quantification of that limited amount. Penalties were set aside because the dispute was bona fide and no mala fide intent was shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>