<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 764 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329055</link>
    <description>Process losses of gases during debulking, storage and cylinder filling were treated as inputs used in or in relation to manufacture, so Modvat credit was not required to be reversed. The Tribunal relied on precedent allowing credit in comparable gas-loss situations, including cases where part of the gas was later returned, and held that the cited authorities fully covered the controversy. As the credit was sustainable, the related penalty did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 764 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329055</link>
      <description>Process losses of gases during debulking, storage and cylinder filling were treated as inputs used in or in relation to manufacture, so Modvat credit was not required to be reversed. The Tribunal relied on precedent allowing credit in comparable gas-loss situations, including cases where part of the gas was later returned, and held that the cited authorities fully covered the controversy. As the credit was sustainable, the related penalty did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>