<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 753 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329044</link>
    <description>The court held that under Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, goods must be released if no notice is issued within six months of seizure. The impugned order was set aside, and the 1st respondent was directed to release the goods within two weeks. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs, affirming the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to the release of goods under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 17:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 753 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329044</link>
      <description>The court held that under Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, goods must be released if no notice is issued within six months of seizure. The impugned order was set aside, and the 1st respondent was directed to release the goods within two weeks. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs, affirming the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to the release of goods under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>