<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty Imposed u/s 271(1)(c) Due to Misunderstanding of American Date System in Deduction Claim Proceedings.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29840</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty by the AO u/s 271(1) (c) - claim of deduction for expenditure incurred in respect of seconded employees - CIT (A) has misconstrued the facts of the case for the reason that he has not understood the American system of dates and for that purpose the entire matter went for a toss - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:31:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:31:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty Imposed u/s 271(1)(c) Due to Misunderstanding of American Date System in Deduction Claim Proceedings.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29840</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty by the AO u/s 271(1) (c) - claim of deduction for expenditure incurred in respect of seconded employees - CIT (A) has misconstrued the facts of the case for the reason that he has not understood the American system of dates and for that purpose the entire matter went for a toss - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:31:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>