<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 740 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329031</link>
    <description>The court held that the Assessing Officer lacked authority to reopen the assessments as the issues were already scrutinized during the original assessment. Notices for reassessment issued beyond four years lacked evidence of the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts. Consequently, all petitions were allowed, and the reassessment notices were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:32:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 740 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329031</link>
      <description>The court held that the Assessing Officer lacked authority to reopen the assessments as the issues were already scrutinized during the original assessment. Notices for reassessment issued beyond four years lacked evidence of the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts. Consequently, all petitions were allowed, and the reassessment notices were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>