<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 736 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329027</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jaipur upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The disallowance of expenses was restricted to a 5.05% net profit rate instead of the 10.2% applied by the AO, resulting in a reduced addition of Rs. 17,75,488. Additionally, the addition under Section 41(1) for unconfirmed liabilities amounting to Rs. 58,87,032 was deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the ITAT due to lack of proper procedure and supporting material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 736 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329027</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jaipur upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The disallowance of expenses was restricted to a 5.05% net profit rate instead of the 10.2% applied by the AO, resulting in a reduced addition of Rs. 17,75,488. Additionally, the addition under Section 41(1) for unconfirmed liabilities amounting to Rs. 58,87,032 was deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the ITAT due to lack of proper procedure and supporting material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>