<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 735 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329026</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the assessment under Section 153A read with Section 143(3) was void ab-initio due to the absence of incriminating documents. It concluded that the transaction was a business deal, not a loan, hence not falling under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. As a result, the addition of Rs. 24,80,911/- was removed, and the appeal was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:32:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 735 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329026</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the assessment under Section 153A read with Section 143(3) was void ab-initio due to the absence of incriminating documents. It concluded that the transaction was a business deal, not a loan, hence not falling under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. As a result, the addition of Rs. 24,80,911/- was removed, and the appeal was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>