<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 729 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329020</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act on a Foreign Company for furnishing inaccurate income particulars. Despite initial rulings upholding the penalty, the Tribunal found the assessee had adequately substantiated expenses, including clarifying the American date format misinterpretation. The Tribunal emphasized the failure of authorities to consider substantial evidence and address procedural errors, leading to the annulment of the penalty and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:31:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 729 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329020</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act on a Foreign Company for furnishing inaccurate income particulars. Despite initial rulings upholding the penalty, the Tribunal found the assessee had adequately substantiated expenses, including clarifying the American date format misinterpretation. The Tribunal emphasized the failure of authorities to consider substantial evidence and address procedural errors, leading to the annulment of the penalty and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>