<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1091 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183770</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the appellant eligible for a refund, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential reliefs. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering evidence provided, especially in cases of refund claims and unjust enrichment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:44:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1091 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183770</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the appellant eligible for a refund, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential reliefs. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering evidence provided, especially in cases of refund claims and unjust enrichment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>