<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 655 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183754</link>
    <description>Reopening under Section 21(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 requires a reasoned approval order; a mechanical sanction that merely states a conclusion, without dealing with the dealer&#039;s objections, is invalid and cannot sustain reassessment proceedings. A non-speaking dismissal of a special leave petition does not amount to a decision on the merits, does not create res judicata, and does not result in merger of the underlying judgment. Accordingly, such dismissal cannot be treated as binding support for reopening on the ground that the commodity was not a drug, and the reassessment notices based on the invalid sanction could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 655 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183754</link>
      <description>Reopening under Section 21(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 requires a reasoned approval order; a mechanical sanction that merely states a conclusion, without dealing with the dealer&#039;s objections, is invalid and cannot sustain reassessment proceedings. A non-speaking dismissal of a special leave petition does not amount to a decision on the merits, does not create res judicata, and does not result in merger of the underlying judgment. Accordingly, such dismissal cannot be treated as binding support for reopening on the ground that the commodity was not a drug, and the reassessment notices based on the invalid sanction could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>