<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 1007 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183738</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals based on the issue of whether the deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act should be allowed before adjusting brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation. The court concluded that Section 10B income should be excluded before computing total income for taxation purposes. The second issue regarding the time-barred re-assessment notice was not addressed as it was not raised before the Tribunal for a decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 1007 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183738</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals based on the issue of whether the deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act should be allowed before adjusting brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation. The court concluded that Section 10B income should be excluded before computing total income for taxation purposes. The second issue regarding the time-barred re-assessment notice was not addressed as it was not raised before the Tribunal for a decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>