https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329016 The Bombay High Court found that the impugned order confirming a demand under the Finance Act, 1994, and imposing penalties was passed in violation of natural justice due to inadequate opportunity for the petitioner to be heard. The Court quashed the order, remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after hearing the petitioner, and imposed costs on the petitioner. Emphasizing the importance of fair hearings, the Court intervened under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, stressing procedural fairness and adherence to natural justice principles in administrative decisions. en-us Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329016 The Bombay High Court found that the impugned order confirming a demand under the Finance Act, 1994, and imposing penalties was passed in violation of natural justice due to inadequate opportunity for the petitioner to be heard. The Court quashed the order, remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after hearing the petitioner, and imposed costs on the petitioner. Emphasizing the importance of fair hearings, the Court intervened under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, stressing procedural fairness and adherence to natural justice principles in administrative decisions. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329016