<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 722 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329013</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal against the confirmation of a service tax demand under Tour Operator Service for the period 2001-2002 to 2003-2004 was partially allowed. The Tribunal found that the appellant had paid the disputed tax amount in good faith due to confusion surrounding the applicability of service tax to tour operators. As a result, the penalties imposed were set aside, granting the appellant relief under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 13:21:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 722 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329013</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal against the confirmation of a service tax demand under Tour Operator Service for the period 2001-2002 to 2003-2004 was partially allowed. The Tribunal found that the appellant had paid the disputed tax amount in good faith due to confusion surrounding the applicability of service tax to tour operators. As a result, the penalties imposed were set aside, granting the appellant relief under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>